US v. Damian Murphy, No. 12-7132 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7132 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. DAMIAN ANTONIO MURPHY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00062-JPJ-1) Submitted: September 11, 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damian Antonio Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Damian Antonio Murphy appeals the district court s order denying his motion for the return of seized property. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murphy, No. 1:06-cr-00062-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. June 11, 2012). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.