US v. David Zebrowski, No. 12-6922 (4th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6922 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, a/k/a Lewis Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Appellee. Daniel Cooke, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Zebrowski appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We review for abuse of discretion a district court s decision on whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) and review de novo a court s conclusion on the scope of its legal authority under that provision. Cir. 2010). United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zebrowski, No. 3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2012; May 8, 2012). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
