US v. Tayron Hines, No. 12-6789 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6789 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TAYRON FRANKLIN HINES, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-7) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tayron Franklin Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tayron order denying § 3582(c)(2) Franklin Hines his several (2006) motion appeals motions, for the district including sentence his reduction. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. court s 18 U.S.C. We have Accordingly, although we grant Hines leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court s order. United States v. Hines, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2012). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials We dispense with legal before contentions the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.