Meredith Vanhoose v. Evelyn Seifert, No. 12-6771 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6771 MEREDITH LEE VANHOOSE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. EVELYN SEIFERT, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:11-cv-00448) Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 3, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Meredith Lee VanHoose, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Meredith Lee VanHoose appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district VanHoose court. Seifert, No. 3:11-cv-00448 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2012). VanHoose s motion for appointment of counsel. Respondent s exhibits. legal before motion strike VanHoose s We deny We also deny the reply brief and We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the to v. court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.