US v. David Wright, No. 12-6102 (4th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6102 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Wright appeals the district court s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and the court s January 4, 2012, oral order denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. See Sloas v. CSX Transp., Inc., 616 F.3d 380, 388 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing abuse of discretion standard for review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) denial of motion to reconsider); United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing abuse of discretion review standard for denial of motion to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2)). we affirm. Accordingly, United States v. Wright, No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2011 & Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
