US v. Jason Millhouse, No. 12-4497 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-4497 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. JASON MARCELLUS MILLHOUSE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00201-RDB-1) Submitted: March 25, 2013 Decided: July 19, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Winelander, WINELANDER & COX, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Debra L. Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jason Marcellus Millhouse pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006), and one count of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). Millhouse preserved his right to appeal the district court s denial of his motion for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978). Perceiving no error in that denial, we affirm. This court reviews de novo the legal determinations underlying a district court s denial of a Franks hearing, and its factual findings for clear error. 631 F.3d 164, 171 (4th Cir. 2011). burden to establish the need United States v. Allen, A defendant bears a heavy for a Franks hearing. States v. Jeffus, 22 F.3d 554, 558 (4th Cir. 1994). meet this preliminary false burden, a showing that statements defendant the necessary the affidavit deceptive a make a In order to substantial intentionally finding of included probable cause. With a claim that the affiant made by omitting burden increases yet more. 449, 454 (4th Cir. 2008). affiant to Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56. must United facts, the defendant s United States v. Tate, 524 F.3d In such a case, the defendant must show that the facts were omitted with the intent to make, or in reckless disregard of whether 2 they thereby made, the affidavit misleading. Id. (quoting United States v. Colkley, 899 F.2d 297, 300 (4th Cir. 1990)). was negligent or made an obtain a Franks hearing. innocent A claim that the affiant mistake is inadequate to United States v. McKenzie-Gude, 671 F.3d 452, 462 (4th Cir. 2011). The preliminary showing must be more than conclusory and must be accompanied by a detailed offer of proof. Colkley, 899 F.2d at 300 (quoting Franks, 438 U.S. In at 171). addition, consideration of the omitted information must be such that its inclusion in the affidavit would defeat probable cause. Colkley, 899 F.2d at 301. Here, although claiming that the affiant officer made an intentional or reckless false statement or omission in the affidavit in support of the search warrant, Millhouse falls far short of making a substantial preliminary showing that the claimed misconduct reflected anything more than an unintentional clerical error. with the Tate, 524 F.3d at 455. district court that the Furthermore, we agree alleged misstatement or omission was not essential to the probable cause determination. See Colkley, 899 F.2d at 301. Therefore, we find that the district court did not err in denying Millhouse s request for a Franks hearing. 3 Accordingly, we affirm the judgment below. We grant Millhouse s motion to file a supplemental pro se reply brief. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * After review of Millhouse s reply brief arguments contained therein to be without merit. 4 we find the
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
