US v. Kelsey Kinard, No. 12-4494 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-4494 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELSEY LENTRELL KINARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00486-TLW-2) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelsey Lentrell Kinard, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Rose Mary Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM Kelsey amended 35(b) Lentrell judgment motion. Kinard granting To the the appeals the Government s extent that district Fed. Kinard s R. claim court s Crim. P. that the district court failed to consider various factors in determining the extent of the sentence reduction challenges the lawfulness of the district court s sentencing methodology, we have jurisdiction over Kinard s appeal. See United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 194 (4th Cir. 2012). We have reviewed the record and find dispense no reversible with contentions are oral error. argument adequately Accordingly, because presented in the the we affirm. We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.