Janice Powell v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan, No. 12-2582 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2582 JANICE H. POWELL; GEORGE T. POWELL, JR., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. FIRST MOUNT VERNON INDUSTRIAL LOAN ASSOCIATION; ARTHUR G. BENNETT; DALE E. DUNCAN; JOHN F. GONZALES; HILTON T. HUTCHENS, JR.; STAFFORD R. PEEBLES, JR.; J. EDWARD SIMS, SR.; ALAINE FIELDS; MICHELLE PARKER-FIELDS; MERCEDES L. MILLER; EDWARD L. MILLER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00695-CCE-JEP) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janice H. Powell; George T. Powell, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. H. Terry Hutchens, HUTCHENS, SENTER & BRITTON, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Gabrielle Amber Pittman, Frederick Kingsley Sharpless, SHARPLESS & STAVOLA, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina; Michael Andrew Grace, Sr., GRACE, TISDALE & CLIFTON, PA, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Mercedes L. Miller; Edward Miller, Appellees Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Janice H. Powell and George T. Powell, Jr. seek to appeal the district court s order accepting the magistrate judge s recommendation and granting the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Sims and Peebles, denying without prejudice the motion to granting dismiss the Defendants filed amended First Bennett, Peebles, Edward Defendant motion Mount Duncan, by to set Vernon Gonzales, Miller, aside Loan Hutchens. Mercedes dismiss the appeal on various grounds. Miller, default Industrial and and Mercedes filed by Association, Appellees Miller and have Sims, moved to This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). seek to appeal is neither a final interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. dismiss as moot. facts and materials legal before The order the Powells order nor an appealable Accordingly, we dismiss the We deny the pending motions to We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.