Matthew Drost v. Atlantic Group, Inc., No. 12-2538 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2538 MATTHEW JORDAN DROST; EDWARD representative Deborah Stewart, STEWART, personal Plaintiffs Appellants, and WILLIAM ANTHONY; BILLY BRASWELL; DAVID DANIEL BUMGARNER; DAVID SCOTT BUMGARNER; PAULETTE BUMGARNER; JAMES MITCHELL CHAPPELL; CHARLES CRENSHAW; JAMES DICKERT; ALAN ERNANDEZ; RICK ERTZBERGER; GARY EVATT; REX EVATT; BARRY EVATT; KEVIN HANCOCK; GEORGE HURLEY; EILEEN ISELI; RANDY JACKSON; ROY JEWELL; DANNY JOHNSON; JAMES KELLY; JUDY LEE; TERRY LEE; JASON LEWIS; BENNY MCGUFFIN; JACK MCQUEEN; LUCAS OLIVER; WILLIAM OWENS; NOLAN PACE; KENNETH PARHAM; ERNEST PRICE; GARY PRINCE; WILLIAM RHODES; WILLIAM SHARPE; MARK DAVID SHEPHERD; BRUCE SMITH; LOUIS SPOONE; ANNETTE SPRINGS; LAYTON SUTTLES; TYSON TAYLOR; ABEL TRAVINO; RANDOLPH WARD; GARY WINCHESTER, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC GROUP, INC., d/b/a DZ Atlantic, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:09-cv-02383-JMC) Submitted: June 26, 2013 Decided: July 12, 2013 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nancy Bloodgood, Lucy C. Sanders, FOSTER LAW FIRM, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellants. Wade E. Ballard, Matthew J. Gilley, Kristin S. Gray, FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Matthew Jordan Drost and Edward Stewart * appeal the district court s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on the Appellants claims related to their termination of employment. erred in The Appellants argue that the district court denying their claims negligent misrepresentation. find no reversible error. court s order. of promissory estoppel and We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm the district We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * As Stewart is deceased, his personal Deborah Stewart, has maintained this appeal. 3 representative,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.