Roger Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated, No. 12-2512 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2512 ROGER DEAN BANDY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00365-JCT) Submitted: July 12, 2013 Decided: July 24, 2013 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Strelka, STRICKLAND, DIVINEY & STRELKA, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Agnis C. Chakravorty, Frank K. Friedman, WOODS ROGERS, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Roger Dean Bandy appeals district court orders striking portions of his complaint and granting summary judgment against him in his age-discrimination action against Advance Auto Parts, Inc. See Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. We have reviewed the record and we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bandy v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc., 2012 WL 6018741 (W.D. Va. Nov. 29, 2012); Bandy v. Advance 831027 (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2012). Auto Parts, Inc., 2012 WL We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.