Brothers of the Wheel M.C. v. Gerald Mollohan, No. 12-2461 (4th Cir. 2013)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2461 BROTHERS OF THE WHEEL M.C. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, INC., a West Virginia Corporation, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GERALD R. MOLLOHAN, Defendant Appellant, and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00104) Submitted: April 3, 2013 Decided: April 18, 2013 Before SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald R. Mollohan, Appellant Pro Se. Richard South Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. J. Lindroth, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Gerald R. Mollohan seeks to appeal the district court s order ruling that he is liable to Appellee for damages and ordering the parties to submit certain information, but ordering that no damages would be awarded until the information is received and evaluated by the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Mollohan Corp., seeks to 337 U.S. appeal is 541, 545-46 neither a (1949). final appealable interlocutory or collateral order. The order order nor an See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737, 742 (1976); Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Dynegy Mktg. & Trade, 415 F.3d 354, 358 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, jurisdiction. We dispense oral with contentions are we deny dismiss the Appellee s argument adequately motions because presented appeal in the the to for lack strike. facts of We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.