Marge Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corporation, No. 12-2332 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2332 MARGE IANNUCCI, Plaintiff Appellant, and MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH) Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Marge entering Iannucci judgment in appeals her the employment district court s discrimination order action in accordance with the Defendant s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and dismissing matter the remainder jurisdiction. discovery and of She entering the also a action for lack appeals the order confidentiality affirm for the reasons stated by the subject compelling order. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we of We have Accordingly, district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.