Elliott Haines, III v. Patrick Donahoe, No. 12-2325 (4th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2325 ELLIOTT HAINES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK A. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00293-ELH) Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 26, 2013 Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elliott Haines, III, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Elliott order granting Haines, III, Defendant s appeals motion for the district summary court s judgment on Haines retaliation-based hostile work environment claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and his gender discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haines v. Donahoe, No. 1:10-cv-00293-ELH (D. Md. filed Aug. 20, 2012; entered Aug. 21, 2012). We further deny Haines motion for appointment of counsel and deny as moot his motion to place this appeal in abeyance for the Supreme Court s decision in Vance v. Ball State Univ., 133 S. Ct. 2434 (2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
