Thomas Switzer v. Sergeant Dean, No. 12-2274 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2274 THOMAS L. SWITZER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SERGEANT DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean, Defendant Appellee, and TOWN OF STANLEY; DOUG PURDHAM, Mayor; OFFICER BROWN; MARK BELTON, Page County Administrator; JOHN THOMAS, Sheriff; DEPUTY HAMMER; PAGE COUNTY JAIL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW) Submitted: February 21, 2013 Before AGEE and Circuit Judge. DAVIS, Circuit Decided: February 25, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas L. Switzer, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, TAYLOR ZUNKER MILNOR & CARTER LTD, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying various post-judgment motions. find no for the Dean, No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012). We deny Switzer s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We reasons dispense reversible stated with contentions are by error. We have reviewed the record and the oral Accordingly, district argument adequately court. because presented in we affirm Switzer v. the the facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.