Thomas Cox v. State of Maryland, No. 12-2134 (4th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2134 THOMAS R. COX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; KELLY PULTZ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George Levi Russell, III, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01364-GLR) Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas R. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip E. Culpepper, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Morgan William Fisher, LAWRENCE & FISHER PLLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. record and find no reversible error. County, Accordingly, we affirm for Cox v. Maryland, No. 1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 10, 2012). argument adequately because presented in the the facts his We have reviewed the the reasons stated by the district court. oral and and materials We dispense with legal contentions are before this and court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.