Chase Hunter v. Paul Higgs, No. 12-1971 (4th Cir. 2012)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1971 CHASE CARMEN HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL W. HIGGS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia; WILLIAM REYES, III, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg; CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VA; NICHOLAS TALBERT, individually and in his official capacity as an employee for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00513-JAG) Submitted: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 1, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Grant Edward Kronenberg, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia; Medford Jennings Brown, IV, Jennifer Lee Parrish, PARRISH, HOUCK & SNEAD, PLC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court s order granting Defendants Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint and its order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Va. July 24, Hunter v. Higgs, No. 3:12-cv-00513-JAG (E.D. 2012; Aug. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.