Bartola Pacetti v. Mark Millard, No. 12-1828 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1828 BARTOLA J. PACETTI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARK S. MILLARD, Judge; ALAN CARLSON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants Appellees, and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Administration; MARY HOLT; KATHY RICCI, Social Security Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB) Submitted: November 9, 2012 Decided: November 19, 2012 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Julia Bougie Judkins, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HORVATH & JUDKINS, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court s orders granting the Appellees motions to dismiss the claims against them in his civil action. * no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293- LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 3, 2012 & filed Apr. 17, 2012, entered Apr. 18, facts 2012). and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although this appeal was interlocutory when the notice of appeal was filed, we have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court has since entered final judgment. See In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 289 (4th Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992). 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.