Catherine Randolph v. Douglas Gansler, No. 12-1793 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1793 CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOUGLAS GANSLER; WILLIAM F. BROCKMAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01466-JFM) Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her subsequent motion for reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons 24, 2012, June 11, 2012). expedite. before by Accordingly, the district Randolph v. Gansler, No. 1:12-cv-01466-JFM (D. Md. May court. legal stated We have We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the We deny as moot Randolph s motion to court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.