Charles Benzing v. Tharrington-Smith, LLP, No. 12-1536 (4th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1536 CHARLES BENZING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THARRINGTON-SMITH, LLP; ALICE C. STUBBS; KATEY M. REGAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00533-F) Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012 Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Benzing, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Maitland Roden, THARRINGTON, SMITH, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert Duncan Church, Wake Forest, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles granting Benzing summary appeals judgment Reporting Act (FCRA) claim. district Defendants for the on the his Fair order Credit On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant s brief. 34(b). court s See 4th Cir. R. Because Benzing does not challenge in his informal brief district court s order granting Defendants motion to dismiss the additional claims in his complaint, he has forfeited appellate review of that order. have reviewed the record and Turning to the FCRA claim, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benzing v. Tharrington-Smith, LLP, No. 5:10-cv-00533-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2012 & Mar. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
