Gregory Camden v. AMSEC Corporation, No. 12-1185 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1185 GREGORY E. CAMDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMSEC CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00554-AWA-FBS) Submitted: October 10, 2012 Decided: October 26, 2012 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory E. Camden, MONTAGNA KLEIN CAMDEN LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael W. Thomas, THOMAS, QUINN & KRIEGER, LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory order dismissing enforcement of Edward his Camden civil attorney s appeals the complaint fee orders district in which issued in a court s he sought proceeding under the Longshore and Harbor Worker s Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Camden v. AMSEC Corp., No. 2:11- cv-00554-AWA-FBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2012). We grant Appellee s motion to reactivate the stayed appeal, and deny Camden s motion seeking dispense judgment with approving oral settlement argument because of the the parties. facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.