Wayne Vinson v. United States Marshall Service, No. 11-7316 (4th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Unpublished opinion after submission on briefs: Affirmed
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7316 WAYNE VINSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES JOYNER, MARSHALS SERVICE; DAVID CRANEFORD; DEONTYE Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00079-RMG) Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wayne Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wayne Vinson appeals the district court s order adopting the magistrate judge s report and recommendation and dismissing Vinson s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, Bivens v. Six 28 U.S.C. Unknown ยงยง 1346(b), Named Agents Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). find no reversible error. 2671-2680 of No. dispense with Accordingly, 0:10-cv-00079-RMG oral argument Fed. and Bureau of We have reviewed the record and reasons stated by the district court. Service, the (2006), we affirm for the Vinson v. U.S. Marshals (D.S.C. Sept. because the 14, 2011). facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
