US v. Stanley Hickman, No. 11-6484 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6484 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. STANLEY HICKMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3) Submitted: July 21, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. GREGORY, Decided: Circuit Judges, July 26, 2011 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Stanley Hickman appeals the district court s order denying his Motion Nunc Pro Tunc for Review of Sentence. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United (E.D.N.C. Jan. States 25, v. 2011). Hickman, We No. dispense 5:93-cr-00144-BO-3 with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.