US v. Pete Muhammad, No. 11-6150 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6150 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PETE NOBLE MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Pete Smith, a/k/a Jose, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (2:93-cr-00117-WO-1) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pete Noble Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Pete Noble Muhammad appeals the district court s denial of his motion to terminate his supervised release under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the district court s decision and have found no abuse of discretion. (4th Cir. defendant s See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 1999) (reviewing supervised district release for court s abuse termination of of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. 2:93-cr-00117-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2011). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.