Titus Thomas v. Officer G. L. Wilson, No. 11-6121 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6121 TITUS THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER G. L. WILSON; OFFICER D. KRAMPT; OFFICER R. ALLISON; OFFICER T. MENGUS; OFFICER HENDERSON; TERRY MILLER, Inmate ID 274-682; JUSTIN CHANEY, Inmate ID 348-112; GARY ANDERSON, Inmate ID 344-943; IMANI GREEN, Inmate ID 337-646, Defendants Appellees, v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Party-in-Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-02003-AW) Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Titus Thomas appeals the district court s order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant s brief. 4th Cir. R. 34(b). See Because Thomas informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court s disposition, Thomas has forfeited Accordingly, dispense we with appellate affirm oral review the argument of district because the court s court s the order. judgment. facts and We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.