Scott Boger v. Gene Johnson, No. 11-6006 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6006 SCOTT M. BOGER, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GENE M. JOHNSON; JOHN JABE; JOHN GARMAN; D. A. BRAXTON; S. W. HOLLAR; LIEUTENANT S. L. SAMPSON; T. HOSTETTER; R. WILLIS; JANE DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00194-sgw-mfu) Submitted: June 23, 2011 Decided: July 7, 2011 Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott M. Boger, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Scott M. Boger appeals the district court s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action and denying his motion to add a party and the court s order denying his motion for reconsideration. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Boger v. Johnson, No. 7:10-cv-00194-sgw- by the district court. mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before the court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.