Charles Simms v. Thomas Dame, No. 11-2122 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2122 CHARLES E. SIMMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS DAME, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-02420-AW) Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Simms, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles denying relief on Simms his appeals 42 U.S.C. the district § 1983 (2006) denying his motion for appointment of counsel. the record and find no reversible error. court s order complaint and We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simms v. Dame, No. 8:11-cv-02420-AW (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2011). We deny Simms motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.