Demetrice E. Douglas v. Charles Veney, No. 11-1586 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1586 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Tennessee corporation, Plaintiff, v. DEMETRICE E. DOUGLAS, Defendant Appellee, v. CHARLES H. VENEY; LEVERNIA HALL, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00542-MHL) Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janipher W. Robinson, ROBINSON & GREENE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. A. Davis Bugg, Jr., RUMSEY & BUGG, P.C., Irvington, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the magistrate judge s * order denying their summary judgment motion and granting Appellee s summary judgment motion on Appellants claims seeking recovery of life insurance proceeds. Appellants Limiting our review to the issues raised in opening brief, see IGEN Int l, Inc. v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, 335 F.3d 303, 308 (4th Cir. 2003); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir. 1999), we have found no reversible error and affirm the magistrate judge s order. See Douglas v. Veney, No. 3:10-cv-00542-MHL (E.D. Va. April 29, 2011). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006). 2 of the

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.