Taylor Witt v. Cable Ad Concept, No. 11-1400 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1400 TAYLOR STONE WITT, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CABLE AD CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation; NORTHLAND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendants Appellees, and CABLE AD CONCEPTS; CORPORATION, NORTHLAND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:08-cv-03778-HFF) Submitted: July 21, 2011 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. GREGORY, Decided: Circuit Judges, July 25, 2011 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Taylor Stone Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Taylor Stone Witt appeals the district court s order denying as untimely her motion to amend her complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have As Witt filed her motion after the district court dismissed her complaint with prejudice, the motion was clearly untimely. affirm. legal before Accordingly, we We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.