Mark Panowicz v. Sprint Nextel Corporation, No. 11-1051 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1051 MARK A. PANOWICZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION; SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; SHARON L. HANCOCK, Clerk of the Court, Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O Grady, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00259-LO-TCB) Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Brown Esaw, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mark A. Panowicz appeals the district court s order dismissing with prejudice his civil complaint for personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), (b)(6). no reversible error. stated by the of See Fed. R. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district September 24, 2010. lack court at the hearing held on Panowicz v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 1:10- cv-00259-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2010; see Mot. Hr g 15-22, ECF No. 36). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.