Deepak Rajani v. The Travelers Indemnity Co,, No. 11-228 (4th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-228 DEEPAK RAJANI; TRAVELLERS.COM, Petitioners, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent. On Petition for Permission to Appeal. (1:10-cv-00448-LO-JFA) Submitted: November 18, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before KING, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deepak Rajani, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Deepak Rajani has filed a petition for permission to appeal numerous district court orders under Fed. R. App. P. 5. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). orders Rajani seeks to contest on appeal are neither The final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders, and we therefore lack jurisdiction to review the orders. we deny Rajani s petition for permission to Accordingly, appeal and deny Rajani s various pending motions filed in the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
