US v. Ruhullah As-Sadiq et al, No. 10-7664 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7664 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. RUHULLAH AS-SADIQ; DION THOMAS, Defendants Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:00-cr-00176-F-1; 5:00-cr-00176-F-3) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ruhullah As-Sadiq, Dion Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ruhullah As-Sadiq and Dion Thomas, federal prisoners, appeal the district court s order denying their joint motion seeking the disclosure, post-trial, of statements made by a codefendant. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. As-Sadiq, Nos. 5:00-cr-00176- F-1; 5:00-cr-00176-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.