Charles Barefoot, Jr. v. Sarah Revell, No. 10-7478 (4th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7478 CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. SARAH REVELL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:10-hc-02030-FL) Submitted: March 15, 2011 Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge. WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and March 18, 2011 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district court s order dismissing his filing styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. Because Barefoot was challenging his conviction and sentence, the court properly concluded that the pleading was a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The court dismissed the action because Barefoot previously sought relief under § 2255 and he did not have authorization from this court to file a second or successive U.S.C.A. § 2255(h) (West Supp. 2010). such motion. See We conclude the court properly dismissed the action. Accordingly, we affirm. note show Barefoot has failed to 28 that he is We also entitled to authorization from this court to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
