Henry Burgess v. Lynn Martin, No. 10-7191 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7191 HENRY BURGESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LYNN MARTIN; JAMES B. ELLISOR; CAMPBELL, JR.; WILLIAM DOUG CATOE, JIM HODGES; CARROLL A. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:09-cv-01247-RBH) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and December 2, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Steven Barry Johnson, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Henry Burgess appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil complaint. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. 4:09-cv-01247-RBH (D.S.C. July 14, 2010). we affirm for the Burgess v. Martin, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.