US v. Tyrone Noble, No. 10-6125 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE NOBLE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9) Submitted: October 26, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tyrone Noble appeals from the district court s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion sentence and his motion for reconsideration. for reduction of We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, and we affirm the denial of Noble s § 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. (D.S.C. Dec. United States v. Noble, No. 3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9 2, 2009). Regarding Noble s motion for reconsideration, although we affirm the district court s denial of the motion, we conclude that the district jurisdiction to consider Noble s motion. court had no See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
