US v. Marty Wright, No. 10-6085 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1) Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 9, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court s order entered on December 10, 2009, denying his Letter/Motion In The Interest of Justice. In Wright s Letter/Motion he appears to seek reconsideration of the court s July 15, 2009 order, which granted him a reduction of his sentence pursuant to See United States v. Wright, No. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). 4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court s denial of Wright s motion to reconsider. we affirm. Accordingly, See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-46 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacked authority to grant defendant s motion to reconsider, filed eight months after the district motion). legal before court s order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
