United States v. Digiovanni, No. 10-4417 (4th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseThis case stemmed from a federal grand jury indictment charging defendant with possession with intent to distribute Oxycodone where defendant moved to suppress the physical evidence seized following a search and certain statements he made to law enforcement officers. At issue was whether the district court properly granted the motion to suppress. The court held that reasonable suspicion was not present to turn a routine traffic stop into a drug investigation. Furthermore, under an extremely deferential standard of review, the court rejected the government's challenge to the district court's finding that defendant's consent was involuntary. Accordingly, the judgment was affirmed.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on August 2, 2011.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.