Garfield Cottrell, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc, No. 10-2362 (4th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Unpublished opinion after submission on briefs: Affirmed
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2362 GARFIELD COTTRELL, JR.; ANGELA C. COTTRELL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10cv-01462-RWT) Submitted: October 19, 2011 Decided: December 1, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason Ostendorf, LAW OFFICE OF JASON OSTENDORF LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Russell J. Pope, TREANOR POPE & HUGHES, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Garfield Cottrell, Jr. and Angela C. Cottrell appeal the district court s order dismissing their civil action. We review de novo a district court s grant of a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Philips v. Pitt Cnty. Mem l Hosp., 572 F.3d 176, 179-80 (4th Cir. 2009), and note that to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a complaint s [f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level and have enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007). record and find no reversible error. Bell Atl. Corp. v. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court on the record at the hearing on the motion. Inc., No. Cottrell v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., 8:10-cv-01462-RWT entered Dec. 7, 2010). (D. Md. filed Dec. 6, 2010 and We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
