Leopold Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Company, No. 10-2329 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2329 LEOPOLD O. V. ENWONWU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; HOUSE OF RAEFORD FARMS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a House of Raeford Columbia Farms; ALLAN RISINGER; ERIC LILES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00858-CMC) Submitted: May 31, 2011 Before WILKINSON and Senior Circuit Judge. Decided: DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, June 7, 2011 and HAMILTON, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leopold O. V. Enwonwu, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Gottlieb Peavy, ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina; John S. Simmons, SIMMONS LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ complaint. error. 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion for summary reversal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.