Jacqueline Carroll-Hall v. The Arc of Baltimore, No. 10-2200 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2200 JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL, Plaintiff Appellant, v. THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI; MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN CAMPBELL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00873-RDB) Submitted: April 29, 2011 Decided: May 18, 2011 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall, Appellant Pro Se. David Jacobson, BLADES & ROSENFELD, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, Appellees. Lee for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jacqueline court s order R. granting Carroll-Hall Defendants appeals motion the to district dismiss her complaint alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010), and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2010). no reversible error. stated by the We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district court. Carroll-Hall v. The Arc Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-00873-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and of We legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.