Dolores Anderson v. National Heritage Foundation, No. 10-2186 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2186 In re: DOLORES F. ANDERSON; DODIE ANDERSON FOUNDATION, Debtors. - - - - - - - - - - - - DOLORES F. FOUNDATION, ANDERSON, a/k/a Dodie Anderson; DODIE ANDERSON Plaintiffs Appellants, v. NATIONAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee, and OFFICIAL CREDITORS COMMITTEE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00039-CMH-IDD). Submitted: June 27, 2011 Decided: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. July 13, 2011 Gregory H. Counts, TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, P.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia; Glenn W. Merrick, G.W. MERRICK & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Greenwood Village, Colorado, for Appellants. Erika L. Morabito, PATTON BOGGS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Dolores F. Anderson and the Dodie Anderson Foundation appeal from the district court s order affirming the bankruptcy court s denial of their motion for leave to file a proof of claim beyond the bar date and the disallowance of their claim in the bankruptcy case of National Heritage Foundation, Inc. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant National Heritage Foundation s motion to submit the appeal on the briefs and affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Anderson v. Nat l Heritage Found., Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00039-CMHIDD (E.D. Va., Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.