William Trainor v. Committee of Unsecured Credit, No. 10-2092 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2092 WILLIAM P. TRAINOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED; WOOD GUNDY LONDON LIMITED, Defendants Appellees, v. MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Debtor, U.S. TRUSTEE-BALTIMORE, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01571-JFM) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. May 31, 2011 William P. Trainor, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Joseph Meehan, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: William P. Trainor seeks to appeal the district court s order denying his motion for a jury trial in his appeal from a bankruptcy court order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Trainor seeks nor to appeal is neither a final interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction. order an appealable Accordingly, we dismiss the We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.