Salame Amr v. Eddie Moore, Jr., No. 10-2041 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2041 SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON; NASSER RASHIDI; GERALD BURTON; DONNA CRAWFORD; GLORIA YOUNG; ALI MOHAMED; OLIVER W. HILL, JR.; WONDI MERSIE; ANDREW KANU; STEPHAN WILDEUS; SHARON EVANS; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS; VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF VISITORS, THE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00667-REP) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Sander, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Salame M. Amr appeals both entered on August 9, 2009, the district court s orders, adopting the magistrate judge s recommendations and dismissing his complaint, and denying Amr s subsequent motion for reconsideration. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 3:09-cv-00667-REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 9, 2010). Amr v. Moore, No. We deny Amr s motions to supplement, for default judgment, for subpoenas, and for reconsideration and relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.