Paul Abbott v. Daniel Guenther, No. 10-1405 (4th Cir. 2011)

 Annotate this Case

Court Description: <

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1405 PAUL ABBOTT; ELAINE BARKER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DANIEL GUENTHER, Esquire, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09cv-02642-RWT) Submitted: March 23, 2011 Decided: April 7, 2011 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Abbott, Elaine Barker, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Patrick Johnson, ECCLESTON &amp; WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paul Abbott and Elaine Barker appeal the district court s order granting Defendant s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district Abbott v. Guenther, No. 8:09-cv-02642-RWT (D. Md. Mar. court. 10, 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.