US v. Keith McNeill, No. 09-8222 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8222 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH DARNELL MCNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1) Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith order denying Darnell his McNeill motion for appeals a the reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). district of court s sentence filed We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion See United States v. Munn, __ F.3d __, in denying the motion. 2010 WL 546486, at *3 (4th Cir. Feb. 17, 2010) (No. 09-7525). Accordingly, we affirm reasons stated there. the district court s order for the See United States v. McNeill, No. 4:08- cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2009). Further, we deny McNeill s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.