US v. William Jones, Jr., No. 09-8165 (4th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8165 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM LEE JONES, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:02-cr-00019-1) Submitted: March 29, 2010 Decided: April 7, 2010 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Lee Jones, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Jones was not eligible for a reduction because he was found responsible for more than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. the district court did not abuse its We affirm. discretion Jones s motion for a sentence reduction. in We find denying See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010) (stating standard of review). A review of the sentencing transcript shows that the sentencing court noted Jones was responsible for more than 5.1 kilograms of crack cocaine. court s order reduction. (S.D. Accordingly, we affirm the district finding Jones was not eligible for a sentence See United States v. Jones, W. Va. Nov. 2, 2009) (citing Guidelines §§ 1B1.10, 2D1.1(c)(1)). No. 2:02-cr-00019-1 United States Sentencing We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
