Frederick Hines v. GEO Group, Incorporated, No. 09-7888 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7888 FREDERICK HINES, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03056-D) Submitted: April 30, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. T. Numbers, II, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Hines appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his complaint, which alleged violations of (1) the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 to § 12213 (2006), (2) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (2006), (3) his Eighth Amendment right to reasonable medical care, and (4) North Carolina negligence laws, and denying his motion for appointment of counsel. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we deny Hines s motion for appointment of counsel and motion to hear full and original record, (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2009). facts and materials legal before affirm for the reasons Hines v. GEO Group, Inc., No. stated by the district court. 5:08-ct-03056-D and Dec. 23, 2008; Sept. 24, 2009; We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.