US v. Keith Burgess, No. 09-7614 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7614 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH LAVON BURGESS, a/k/a Buck Black, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00107-TLW-1) Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Lavon Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith Lavon Burgess appeals the district court s order denying his motion for reduction U.S.C. ยง 3582(c) (2006). no reversible error. of sentence pursuant States v. Accordingly, we affirm. Hood, 18 We have reviewed the record and find United States v. Burgess, No. 4:03-cr-00107-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009). United to 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009), See cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 2009 WL 2496498 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 095868). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.