US v. Keith Harris, No. 09-7515 (4th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7515 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00100-FL-2) Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying his motion for reduction § 3582(c)(2) (2006). of sentence under 18 U.S.C. The district court concluded Harris was not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris range of imprisonment remained the same, the mandatory minimum reviewed the record and find no error. sentence. We have Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Harris motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.