US v. Bernard Sherill, No. 09-7030 (4th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7030 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BERNARD DONNELL SHERILL, a/k/a Nard, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Noell Peter Tin, TIN, FULTON, WALKER & OWEN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bernard Donnell Sherill appeals the district court s order granting his 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c) (2006) motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States v. 2009). legal before Sherill, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8 (W.D.N.C. United May 22, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.