Aaron Pretty, Jr. v. David Mitchell, No. 09-6758 (4th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6758 AARON S. PRETTY, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent of Mountain View Correctional Institution; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:09-cv-00140-WO-PTS) Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron S. Pretty, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aaron court s judge order and S. Petty, accepting dismissing (2006) petition unless a as circuit appealability. Jr., the seeks appeal recommendation without prejudice successive. justice to or The judge the district of the 28 U.S.C. his order is issues a 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). magistrate not § 2254 appealable certificate of A certificate of appealability will not issue absent a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (2006). 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. court is likewise debatable. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pretty has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.